Make no mistake, I still think the Canon is the greatest camera overall (I shoot with Canon in order to take this which has a pinch of salt if you think I'm being biased). However, the fact that those a new comer to DSLR, the Nikon D5100 can be a more desirable buy. People are not planning to work with MF in video way of example along with the land of the blind, usually the one eye man is king so Nikon's AF-F is definitely something which will draw the lookers. Furthermore, inside the Nikon D5100, now we have a number of different filters and effects. This is just the thing for those who find themselves already in love with the idea when shooting with compact cameras. So far as the megapixel war can be involved, the main difference is now close enough that just a pixel peeper will truly argue and it's clear that Nikon is still centered on marketing their model's "better" performance on noise handling and ISO range - the Nikon D5100 posseses an extended ISO range approximately ISO 25600. The progres with the tilt format in the D5000 can also be another key change for the consumer. Not really one for the pros, but it's a hefty problem wanting to begin to see the LCD in the D5000 after you have got it mounted on a tripod, the industry serious issue for consumers planning to shoot photos of themselves making use of their household. This implies that Nikon is absolutely listening and making the essential changes to produce us happier using their products. Which to select? Nikon or Canon? As it pertains down to it, it is certainly the common reply you generally hear in photography. It's really a couple of "horses for courses". Not really that the Canon is exceedingly complicated though the Nikon comes across being a "simpler" creation that is much more dedicated to the customer market. However, for pros trying to find a secondary camera or possibly a more serious amateur, the Canon should be the better option. One primary reason is always that there is no internal motor on the Nikon D5100 and thereby losing the ability to focus on plenty of non-AF-S lenses inside Nikon lens range. This is a shame unless you are pre-made manual focus with those lenses. However, should you be prepared as well as able to that, it begs the question if whether you ought to be getting something better like the Nikon D7000 or perhaps the Canon EOS 7D instead.Summary of http://canont3ivsnikond5100.com • Obtain the Nikon D5100 should you prefer a well spec'd camera that is greatly tuned towards the entry-level user and may present you with great photos with minimal fuss. • For http://canont3ivsnikond5100.com , Obtain the Canon EOS 600D if you are planning to have serious in photography in addition to DSLR videography and desire something you won't want to put away despite you will get really good.
With HD video recording, great image quality, and a solid selection of lenses, the Nikon D5100 and Canon T3i are on the top of a lot of wish lists out there. For people already in the Canon or Nikon camp (full disclosure: I'm a Canon man), the choice is obvious if an upgrade is in their future, but for the less dogmatic and new recruits to the DSLR crowd, it's not nearly as clear-cut. $800 buys you a lot of camera either way.Pixel peepers will want to check out the reliable and exhaustive reviews at DP Review (here and here) and other photography-centric sites where systematic checks on image quality are conducted, but I wanted to just put these two worthy devices head to head and see not just how they compare technically but in everyday use.So, nothing decisive. Nikon has an edge in its autofocus system and (ostensibly) ISO capability, and Canon has a couple more megapixels and a slightly better LCD. But they're close enough that it's no way to determine which to get.Yet one of these must be the better camera, or at least certain types of shooters might reasonably prefer one or the other. I'm going to look at a few of the major differentiating points that you wouldn't really think about unless you had the camera in your hands. Note that these points are not necessarily new with these cameras! The primary change in these two models is the addition of an articulating LCD. Otherwise they're very similar to their predecessors. But since these are the newest models and are likely to make the prospective DSLR-buyer lose some sleep (as they are both excellent values), a straight comparison seems in order. This is a practical comparison focusing on things consumer commonly care about.Both cameras were tested using their kit lenses and processed in Adobe Lightroom. And the lenses form as good a place to start as any, as a large amount of first-time DSLR buyers stick with the kit lens at least for the starting period.I can't tell you which of these cameras will feel better to shoot. But let's just run down the cameras' strengths really quick. Some of these are just my opinion, obviously, but I think it's legit to say when something seemed truly preferable to me.Canon T3iSomewhat sharper, more convenient LCDAggressive shape more suitable for larger handsControls more ergonomicMore all-purpose kit lens60fps video recording and 4:3 VGA modeMore convenient as an primary video deviceSupports more in-production lensesNikon D5100More compact, definitely feels smallerBetter viewfinder coverageFaster entry and better performance in Live ViewSingle flap for I/O portsScene modes and quality control in videoHigher ISOs available (though not necessarily practical)Quick setting of single autofocus pointsLook at those lists and see if anything catches your eye. Because these are both excellent cameras and either way you're going to get a lot for your money. If I had to choose, I'd say that the Canon is a better buy: the kit lens, more versatile video, and a more serious-feeling body. That said, the Nikon is definitely more compact, and for some, its video options may be better.